NZHerald on "blame for addiction"
read more | digg story
IMHO prohibition sentiment requires inherent addiction to status quo, an incapacity to visualise beyond the here and now and a desperate desire to know others might feel the same... Reform is not revolutionary, rather it is evolutionary. Having survived banging your head against a brick wall the evolutionist relishes having stopped. / Blair
Labels: alcohol, deviancy, Netherlands, social ecology, STDs, suicide

"Mayor Blair" Anderson is the only Mayoral Candidate to be sponsored by a dog. Yes, 'Holmes' who featured on the front page of the PRESS (May 2006) for catching a 'drug' burglar flogging tobacco from the Wainoni Dairy (opp Christchurch's Porritt Park) has, in the interests of full disclosure, contributed to the BlairForMayor election deposit.
Mayor Blair was heard to say in the Cashel Mall on announcing the formal intention to run for the golden chains, that it was "a logical and mutual association to receive such support".
Anderson went on to say "The metaphor of the marginalised dog kept behind high fences and on short leads is the root of a great deal of the social dysfunction across all of New Zealand, no less so in Christchurch."
When Central Government makes the rules, it is often the local bodies who have to pick up the tab and are expected to implement and account for the policy.
As NZ's first candidate sponsored by a dog, Anderson declared his vested interests in community dog policy and announced that "as Mayor" he would move to make the government mandated 'microchips' a life time dog registration. "What does it cost to keep a name on a list, GOOGLE would do it for free!" he said.
Further as Mayoral Candidate he noted that he wasn't even required to give up his birth date to run for Mayor, and further more that along with his offer of giving three years of 'civic duty' to his city, his dog registration would be 150% of what it costs to be a mayoral candidate. "What's wrong with this picture?"
Dog fees have escalated to a revenue gathering tax that on evidence has done little or nothing to prevent serious canine behaviours and continuing bite tragedies. The media moral panic and subsequent baying for blood and inevitably calls for more rules (Some school children now want ALL dogs muzzled) fail to notice that 600,000 plus dogs in New Zealand didn't bite anyone today.
We need more socialised dogs. That's a start.
More on Blair's insightful vision for Christchurch "Smart City, Clever People"
http://blairformayor.blogspot.com/2007/08/smart-city-clever-people.html
competing interests: http://doglinks.co.nz/
‹(•¿•)› Blair Anderson
ph (643) 389 4065 cell 027 265 7219
Labels: Burglary, CCC, Dog, drug policy, Mayoralty
Forget the Milton Hilton. Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman Garth McVicar has been to see prisons so bad no-one wants to come back. see http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/4173001a6427.html
In Arizona prisoners are put up in tents, chained together and made to work outdoors in all weather.
McVicar thinks the idea is "fantastic" and, after visiting the US state to study the regime, thinks it could work in New Zealand.
In Arizona prisoners are put up in tents, chained together and made to work outdoors in all weather.
Labels: Prison Muster, racism, Sensible Sentencing, war on drugs
The (Seattle based) King County Bar Association commissioned a Drug Policy Project, led by now-State Representative ( WA/Blair) Roger Goodman, that produced a well-researched report calling for an end to drug prohibition and a transition to having government regulate and control currently illegal drugs, instead of simply handing their distribution to criminal gangs who bring violence to our cities to protect their profits. Countries like Switzerland, Portugal, Australia, Canada, Holland, and even Russia, have taken steps to decriminalize drug use.
Recently, the UK drug law reform organization Transform released an impressive document for drug law reformers called Tools for the Debate. It's like a play book for anyone who wants to be successful in breaking down the rhetoric and the propaganda that has kept this massively unsuccessful public policy afloat for so long. One of the major stumbling blocks to getting the message out is described here in the report:
In this political arena a virulent disease known as 'Green Room Syndrome' is epidemic, where strongly held beliefs on reform disappear as soon as the record button is pressed for broadcast. This is something we have experienced again and again: fellow-debaters who privately admit to agreeing with us in the Green Room before a media interview, only to feign shock and outrage at our position once the cameras and microphones are on. There are many in politics and public life who understand intellectually that the prohibition of drugs is unsustainable, but who default in public to moral grandstanding and emotive appeals to the safety of their children.
Lee's blog discusses this in more detail at HorsesAss.Org - http://www.horsesass.org
Eddie Ellison, MP Jeanette Fitzsimonds, Blair Anderson on 2004 MildGreen-Leap tour.
The distinction between legal and illegal drugs is not justifiable under any scientific, logical or public health criteria and is purely an artefact of quirks in our social and political history.

Both tobacco and alcohol are often talked of as if they are not 'real drugs' - or sometimes not drugs at all, underlined by the frequent use of daft phrases such as 'alcohol and drugs', which is about as logical as saying 'orange juice and drinks' or 'sandals and footwear'. Obviously both alcohol and tobacco are powerful psychoactive drugs; potentially highly toxic, addictive and associated with high mortality rates. Were they to be classified under the current policy regime (the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 [1975 in NZ. ed.]) they would certainly be class A or B. / TRANSFORM
"The role of government should be to prevent the most chaotic drug users from harming others – by robbing or by driving while drugged, for instance – and to regulate drug markets to ensure minimum quality and safe distribution. The first task is hard if law enforcers are preocupied with stopping all drug use; the second, imposible as long as drugs are illegal." [The Economist, editorial. From Issue entitled: 'Time to legalise all drugs' 28.06.01]
What we've recently learned about cannabis
Listed here the latest scientific facts about cannabis. Most of the information is taken from that well respected peer-reviewed scientific journal, The Daily Mail*, whom I would like to thank for their valuable contribution to rational debate and responsible, well balanced reporting.
Thanks to Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
* The Daily Mail is a British newspaper and the oldest tabloid, first published in 1896. It is Britain's second biggest-selling daily newspaper after The Sun.
Labels: cannabis, media, multi-disciplinary study, science
Job hunters perfecting their resumes for that dream job are being urged to also polish their online profile - and clean it up if needs be, with a new breed of companies emerging to help mold Internet images. (see Experts to clean up your online image )
Recruitment experts advise job hunters to Google themselves before stepping out into the competitive job market to see if a search pull ups that blog entry written about legalizing marijuana or drunken party photos with friends.(and Select Committee after Select Committee have failed to understand that the law is driven by prejudice. Opinions, political or otherwise are a Bill of Rights/Human Rights Issue /Blair)

Labels: cannabinoids, civics, democracy, disease, environment, politics, society

There are reports in the press this week that according to experts, children as young as six are being treated for addiction to cannabis and are presenting symptoms including paranoia, anxiety, depression and even schizophrenia.
It also emerged last September in Scotland that children aged 10-years-old were dealing drugs.
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick will suggest in Community Care next week that the rise of drug abuse among young children has coincided with the increase of drugs education.
He says: "Gordon Brown has endorsed the fashionable "drugs education", particularly favouring its extension to primary schools. Here is another policy immune to the evidence of failure.
"Never mind that the spread of drugs education appears to coincide with a dramatic increase in drug taking by school students – the government believes that we need more of the same, extended to even younger children."
At the same time, Britain has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe despite numerous government initiatives designed to take the problem.

Given that children taking drugs are getting younger and Britain has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Britain, is sex and drug education in Britain effective at educating children or does it merely fuel the curiosity of young people?
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick suggests: "Why not instead teach children something interesting and inspiring, that might give them the truly radical idea that culture and society have more to offer than drug-induced oblivion?"
Labels: age of consent, confusing messages, education, efsdp, health promotion, sex drugs porn alcohol abstinence morals, teens



Labels: cannabis, culture, media, Weeds. Outrageous Fortune