Canvassing for Opinion - aka "Blairs Brain on Cannabis"

IMHO prohibition sentiment requires inherent addiction to status quo, an incapacity to visualise beyond the here and now and a desperate desire to know others might feel the same... Reform is not revolutionary, rather it is evolutionary. Having survived banging your head against a brick wall the evolutionist relishes having stopped. / Blair

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

MildGreen Activist Arrested "On High"

Icon for censorshipImage via Wikipedia
Yesterday afternoon. 26th January.
Police arrest Blair Anderson for 'breaching the peace' - talking about SAFERCHOICE.ORG and "Nice People Take Drugs" in 'High Street' Christchurch, at 3:30ish.
Bail conditions set by the Police include to not enter the 'four avenues' a mile square of the central city region (coincidentally the boundary of the city alcohol free zone).
"I guess it can be designated the 'speech free zone' too now."
From a broader perspective, the arrest of this former mayoral and parliamentary candidate has grave implications for freedom of assembly and bill of rights 'freedom of speech'. Especially as Mayor Bob Parker has the ground covered with surveillance cameras.
Parker called for and invested millions into 'anti-crime' post his election as Mayor. Some may recall him saying after he had accompanied "Police" one Saturday evening during his campaign that cameras had proven themselves, as two law breakers were charged with criminal offences (thus his justifying spending even more). He said it was for catching 'criminal offenders', that law abiding people had nothing to fear at the 'Christchurch Press' sponsored 'Town Hall' debates.
Some may also recall the MildGreen Mayoral candidate leaning forward to the microphone and reminding him and the audience "it was cannabis Bob!".
"It was purported by the Police arresting Officer he didn't have an issue with my subject matter, rather that my soapboxing was driving people away from enjoying their lunches (his words). It seemed to escape him that it was after three thirty in the afternoon!."
"It should be ironic that my voice, unaided by electronics or any other assistance, is sufficient to disturb the peace in the inner city when it is difficult to be heard over the traffic and ambient 'speakers' blaring from atop city business houses, or that in the preceding hour there had been a street performance act courtesy of city council provided sound reinforcement - part of  of the "International Buskers Festival Week".
"Of course he never spoke to anyone having their lunch, but he was seen to confer with someone who was a city council employee (or contractor) who seems is the 'complainant' or person who was offended no doubt eager to protect city event sponsors interests, especially those of Lindauer, Christchurch Casino, Heritage Hotel, Millennium Hotel, Copthorne Hotel, and of course the pokie (gambling addictions) revenues of Pub Charity, Lion Foundation, Mainland Foundation, Southern Trust and finally, the Embassy of the United States of America.  
"Prior to any of this, I had informally approached the designated person in charge to determine if they, the busking event  had well and truly concluded their days activities as I had no desire to stand on any ones toes. He had respected that I had asked and said 'go ahead'. So that cannot have been an issue. Well not one 'a reasonable person' could anticipate in a public designated gathering space evidently suited for performance art, and adjacent too be railway line construction zone. So it cannot have been the noise."
"One of the last matters I raised with the assembled crowd before my arrest was the New Years gong given to that drug baron, Doug Meyers.... " notes the long time contributor to parliamentary due process. "Members of the public approached and shook my hand, you don't see that online, in the paper or on TV!"
With this kind of 'chilling effect' on the public discourse, is it no longer possible to speak publicly about drug policy in the four avenues "at least until a Judge gives me permission" ?
Anderson has argued for a year that media have sidelined any mention that New Zealand legally regulated psychoactive recreational drug use 'when John Key became Prime Minister' but alcohol policy  and neighbouring intoxicants is off the menu along with any right to speak about it in public. Not even the Hon. Jim Anderton under whose watch this regulatory initiative was passed has been asked 'for what purpose did Labour do this "Order in Council' if it was only to remain an empty vessel?'.
"I was speaking as close as practicable to the now defunct but contentiously removed city plan designated 'amphitheatre' area of Cashel and High Streets (also known, some could argue pejoratively, as the 'hack circle')  - of course the important role of an amphitheatre 'as a place for speaking' can be best encapsulated by simply Googling it along with the word 'democracy'."
These are interesting times.
The case is set down for the Christchurch District court on the fourth day of February.
The writer is somewhat flummoxed, the Court Building is inside the area to which he has been 'prohibited'.
 "As is my lawyer, several of my Members of Parliament, and the Human Rights Commission."
"I have diarised meetings with key stakeholders, including Canterbury District Health Board and ALAC to discuss but they are all in the Four Avenues - I guess I will just have to break the law again, sometime soon". (see PRESS: University forum targets binge-drinking 23/01/2010)
The writer will be pleading 'not guilty' arguing false arrest, there is no charge to answer.  "Clogging the court has become the last bastion of civil dissent, this silliness is going to cost the country thousands. They better do that drug policy cost benefit analysis soon and fix this glaring anomaly."
The writer further notes... a Bill of Rights violation has occurred and the Christchurch City Council will be asked to account.
"Now that is what courts are for...."

Blair Anderson  ‹(•¿•)›

Social Ecologist 'at large, but still living in unhealthy Christchurch'
ph nz  (643) 389 4065   nz cell 027 265 7219

Labels: , , , , , ,

View blog reactions


  • At 10:31 am, January 30, 2010, Blogger Natalie said…

    This is incredible that someone has been arrested for speaking about drugs in public and IT HASNT MADE THE MAINSTREAM NEWS!!!

    This man has been arrested- slapped on the hand-cuffs, stuffed in a police car, driven in the backseat escorted to the police station, photographed, plunked into a cell...

    ...keys rattling

    ...door locked behind you

    all for psychological effect...

    Now imagine if someone had a mental illness and was treated that way.

    Imagine if someone was repeatedly being told that he was a failure for smoking grass.

    Imagine that his parents threatened to kick him out if he didn't go to church and pray for his forgiveness for doing 'something illegal'.

    This is how the 'medical professionals' and the Police justify correlating the 'harms of cannabis' and psychosis.


    New Zealand is living in the dark ages where someone has been ARRESTED for speaking in PUBLIC about CANNABIS.

    This reminds me of the witchhunts of the 1500's. You look like a witch, you burn at the stake.

    The anti-drug crusade (from the word "The Crusades" and not our rugby team) is a Christian moral movement.

    You can't smoke cannabis because it's illegal. If you do, you are acting immorally, and therefore you are going to pugatory (jail).


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Another Mild Green Initiative

  (search tips)

Visitor Map
Visitor Map, daily!

Visitor Map, previous 6 months

MildGreen Technorati Search
Web Blog Pinging Service Blog Flux Directory Blogarama - The Blog Directory Find Blogs in the Blog Directory Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory Health Blog Top Sites Google PageRank Checker Tool Top Blogs Health blogs